Review By Bob Neill,Positive Feedback Online,January 2013
This music can be as cerebral as its German and French equivalents but it also has great passion and suffering. Schnittke is as compelling a way into this music as any of his contemporaries.
The musicians are from the faculty of Vanderbilt University…They are really good, as is the recording. This is the best recording of a violin I’ve heard in a l-o-n-g time. This whole project is the kind of thing that Naxos does best: seek out truly fine but less well known musicians, give them interesting music to perform, and then record the hell out of them. © 2013 Positive Feedback Online Read complete review
Review By Art Lange ,Fanfare,March 2012
violinist Carolyn Huebl and pianist Mark Wait make such a convincing argument for each of these distinctive works. They handle the variety and contrasts of Schnittke’s polystylistic perspective with sensitivity and security, and adapt their impressive tonal resources to every demand the composer makes… © 2012 Fanfare Read complete review on Fanfare
Review By Santiago Martín Bermúdez,Scherzo,February 2012

8.570978_Scherzo_022012_sp.pdf
Review By Gonzalo Pérez Chamorro,Ritmo,December 2011
Sin llegar a ser la violinista Carolyn Huebl un Gidon Kremer o un Mark Lubotsky, los dedicatarios de estas sonatas, la americana se adentra en la integral de las Sonatas para violín y piano de Schnittke convirtiéndose en una grotesca prolongación de la escritura del ruso, que si a algo debe sonar su música, es a él, el poliestilista más caricaturesco del siglo XX, cuya música puede provocar la mueca, el llanto o un encogimiento de hombros ante su audición, siempre en torno a una incómoda y ligera sensación de que a uno le están “tomando el pelo”, que lo que suena no es exactamente lo que debe significar. “Esto” no ocurre en la Sonata núm. 1 (1963), de una intensa expresividad y clara belleza (Largo), pero sí aparece claramente en la Sonata núm. 2 “Quasi una Sonata” (1968), donde el piano y el violín ejercen un discurso opuesto, como si la discusión fuera el nexo de unión para crear una sonata, tal vez de ahí provenga el “Quasi…” de su sobrenombre. Desde la década de los setenta Schnittke contacta con Gidon Kremer, destinatario de numerosas obras, entre ellas la visceral Sonata núm. 3 (1994), más austera que la Núm. 2 y mejor música. El disco se completa con una Sonata (1955) muy neoclásica, de estreno póstumo.
more....
Review By Allen Gimbel,American Record Guide,November 2011
Sonata 1 (1963)…moves freely through the funky neo-tonality of the sarcastic scherzo and belatedly jazz age-toccata finale to the full-fledged triadic spiritualism of the slow movement: a typical Shostakovich mix. The piece was a triumph for the 29-year-old composer…
Sonata 2 (1968), subtitled Quasi una Sonata, bids farewell to Shostakovich and replaces him with a late-60s “avant-garde” substitute…
Sonata 3 (1994)…is one of the great “Late Works”.
…lots of evidence of talent and musicality…It’s a sobering finale to this fascinating program, and offers much food for thought.
Review By Remy Franck,Pizzicato,September 2011
Von der Leidenschaftlichkeit der erste Violinsonate von 1963, über die Violinsonate Nr. 2, die Schnittke ‘Quasi una Sonata’ untertitelte—sie sei, so der Komponist, “ein Bericht über die Unmöglichkeit der Sonate in Form einer Sonate”—bis zur asketischen Dritten Violinsonate und der gleichfalls sehr einfachen Jugendsonate bleibt eines gleich: die Tiefe der Botschaft in Alfred Schnittkes Musik. Das amerikanische Duo Carolyn Huebl und Mark Wait, Professorin bezw. Dekan der ‘Blair School of Music’ an der Vanderbilt University in Nashville, sind sowohl technisch als auch interpretatorisch dem anspruchsvollen Programm vollauf gewachsen und bringen die vier Sonaten in aufregenden Einspielungen zu Gehör. In ihrem souveränen Spiel ist jede Note erfüllt, und die Musik bringt Schnittkes Seelenzustände, seine Grimassen und seine lyrischen Momente faszinierend zum Ausdruck.
Das recht trockene Klangbild der Aufnahme verstärkt die Wirkung der Musik, in der uns andere weitaus berühmtere Interpreten nicht mehr gepackt haben als Huebl und Wait. Und da die Naxos-Produktion die einzige Gesamtaufnahme der Violinsonaten des genialen Schnittke ist, verdient sie ohne Zweifel unsere Auszeichnung!
more....
Review By John Pitcher,Art Now Nashville,August 2011
Huebl and Wait give a performance that is thoughtful and intensely in the moment. Huebl sends searing violin notes soaring into the stratosphere in the first movement, and she probes every dark emotional corner in the Adagio. The duo plays the finale with the spontaneity of an improvisation.
Review By Mark Sealey,MusicWeb International,August 2011
Schnittke’s intensity, focus and inward-directed heat are ideally suited to chamber music. Concentration, minimal consonance, the timbres of individual instruments together with their textures when sounded harmonically create a fertile world. There the wry and self-confident Russian melodies that Schnittke introduces, almost behind your back, can grow, strengthen and affect you.
Carolyn Huebl and Mark Wait, both from Vanderbilt University, Nashville, here present all three of the composer’s numbered sonatas for violin and piano along with the earliest one from 1955. They have the characteristics of great reflection, tightness, economy, though of a restrained and bare lyricism; of variety and a mix of moods from the sombre to the almost jaunty and jazzily lighthearted (the fourth movement of No. 1 [tr.4], for example). Indeed, together with the pair’s extreme technical yet unobtrusive virtuosity, this faculty of being at home in all Schnittke’s many idioms is one of this excellent CD’s strongest points.
Equally remarkable is the extent to which Huebl throws herself into the essence of Schnittke’s string writing. Almost all of his violin sonata writing was directly inspired by the work—and hence the style—of Mark Lubotsky and Gidon Kremer with their acerbic and understated tautness. To Wait’s unretiring yet sensitive pianism, Huebl brings an equally demonstrative certainty. She never over-layers Schnittke’s sonorities; they are designed to be as spare in sound as his themes are meant to prick rather than caress.
The Sonata No. 1 dates from 1963; it was in the following year that Lubotsky gave the première. It makes use of serial techniques and is generally springily experimental. Significant among its characteristics—and equally well brought out by these two fine soloists—is the relationship between piano and violin: prompting, antagonising, supporting, echoing and so on. Huebl and Wait explore these seamlessly and add to the momentum of the sonata greatly by respecting Schnittke’s conception of the duality of these two instruments.
Sonata for Violin and Piano No. 2 Quasi una Sonata was written just five years later, in 1968. The longest single work on the CD at nearly 23 minutes, it’s one of the composer’s best well-known and most often performed pieces with much more angularity—anger even—than the others here. Yet, again, Huebl and Wait have rightly preferred to accentuate the music’s essence over its surface. There are the glissandi, mordent harmonics and wistful rhythmic ambiguities—all characteristic of Schnittke. We also hear the gestures that may or may not be quotations—they’re certainly evocative—and the dissonant intervals and repetitive chords—famously those for piano toward the end of the piece. The players here are full of life, not labour: very pleasing performances. They evoke the emotion, they don’t ‘demonstrate’ it.
more....
Review By Grego Applegate Edwards,Gapplegate Classical-Modern Music Review,July 2011
Of all the recognized Russian composers of the 20th century, Alfred Schnittke (d. 1998) often sounds the least Russian. He ordinarily avoids nationalist melodic, harmonic or rhythmic tendencies, preferring instead to carve out his own version of the expressive modernist international style in its later developments. This is especially true of his chamber music. Schnittke’s four sonatas for violin and piano were composed over most of his active career, the first stemming from 1955, the last, 1994. It turns out they all fit nicely on a single 70-minute CD. Violinist Carolyn Huebl and pianist Mark Wait set out to do just that, and they have succeeded in giving us thoroughgoing, expressive and exacting performances of same on a new Naxos release (8.570978).
Other than the first (unnumbered) sonata from 1955, these are certainly on the surface of things firmly in a modernist tradition. They nevertheless bear the individual Schnittke watermark: often utilizing twelve-tone-serial-and-beyond techniques but in a very personal way, freely bending them toward his own harmonic and rhythmically lively ends while culling and synthesizing the full spectrum of concert music styles from the Baroque to the present, all in ways that are distinctly Schnittkian in their strikingly inventive thematic idiosyncrasies.
The violin sonatas are excellently representative Schnittke. The 1955 work a fascinating look at his early beginnings, the first through third sonatas masterpieces of 20th century chamber arts. Ms Huebl and Mr Wait do an excellent job bringing out the nuances of these very complex and vital works. The sound is very good as well. It’s a treasure trove for an Schnittke enthusiast; it also serves as a good introduction to his music for anyone unfamiliar with it. At the Naxos price the disk is especially attractive!
more....
Review By Joshua Meggitt ,Cyclic Defrost,June 2011
Alfred Schnittke is, in many ways, like a Russian Charles Ives, incorporating ‘samples’ from across, and beyond, the canon into his works, creating heterogeneous compositions rich with wit, allusion and humour, They’re also frequently filled with sadness and dread, as in his harrowing Piano Quintet written after the death of his mother.
Aspects of that work, as led by the piano and lead violin, feed into his violin sonatas, all of which, including the unpublished-in-Schnittke’s-lifetime Violin Sonata of 1954–5, are presented here. Echoes of this early work, defined by a mournful opening and subsequent economical dialogue between the instruments, returns in his final sonata. Written in his 60s after a number of strokes, Schnittke here is spare in his language, suggesting more than revealing, yet packing great emotion into such subtle gestures. Sonatas 1 and 2, from 1964 and 1968 respectively, are more active and dynamic, dipping occasionally into tonality only to disrupt it with jagged serial outbursts. This wonderful collection is an excellent entry point into Schnittke’s endlessly fascinating musical world.
more....