Review By Joseph Magil,American Record Guide,January 2011
Dmitry Cogan is an excellent partner and not merely an accompanist, and the sound recorded at the CBC’s Glenn Gould Studios is very good. This would be a worthwhile acquisition for anyone interested in looking at the work of one master from the point of view of another from a later time.
To read the complete review, please visit American Record Guide online.
Review By Robert Maxham ,Fanfare,January 2011
Fritz Kreisler made a rather large number of arrangements of Paganini’s music, and a great deal of them appear in Philippe Quint’s collection. In addition to these, Kreisler arranged the First Concerto’s first movement in a version that he himself recorded (though not until 1936, when he had entered his 60s—it’s the only Paganini he recorded), as, later, would Alfredo Campoli and Guila Bustabo. August Wilhelmj also arranged the first movement of that concerto, snipping here and there, reorchestrating, and adding romantic transitions—but Kreisler’s version bears the imprint of both Vienna and his own personality. While Heifetz, early on, reportedly played Wilhelmj’s arrangement with piano (Váša Příhoda recorded it that way), I’m not aware of a tradition of performing Kreisler’s version. So this roster of works arranged for violin and piano seems pretty much complete.
Quint begins with the finale of the Second Concerto, often played as an encore. He possesses not only the agility to make the harmonics tinkle (the movement’s subtitle, “La campanella,” suggests the ringing of bells) but the stylistic sensitivity and adaptability to play the occasional passage as though it had been written by Kreisler rather than Paganini (and the accompaniments—Kreisler, like Heifetz, played the piano almost as well as he did the violin—indulge Kreisler’s tendency to gemütlich chromaticism). Occasionally here, as in other pieces, Kreisler simplifies or omits, but the excisions and emendations hardly ever disfigure the torso he’s left. And Quint plays with such authority that it’s hard to hear these arrangements as anything but definitive, though inspection reveals otherwise.
Paganini’s variations showcase many of his most difficult technical innovations (there’s nothing in the caprices, for example, to equal the accompanied pizzicatos or double harmonics of the variations on God Save the King). They’re difficult enough to make a dazzling impression even when some of the terrors have been shorn, as in Kreisler’s arrangements. He certainly didn’t blanch at the double harmonics that figure so prominently in the Variations on Non più mesta, and neither does Quint, though they’re not 99 and 99/100 percent pure in his reading.
The young Jascha Heifetz and the young Michael Rabin made electrifying impressions, each, in the Moto perpetuo. If Quint doesn’t bite as deeply into the string as they did even at their lickety-split tempos, he still manages to make a lively impression; his reading takes 4:11, with Heifetz’s (1918) and Rabin’s (1960) and Ricci’s, 3:59, 3: 13, and 4:00, respectively, but Rabin didn’t repeat the first section. It’s impossible to distinguish the difficult passages from the easy ones. Next in Quint’s program come the three caprices Kreisler arranged for violin and piano (Heifetz used to play the 13t
more....
Review By Paulino Toribio,Ritmo,January 2011
Aunque pertenecientes a diferentes centurias, Kreisler y Paganini tienen en común el haber dedicado sus vidas íntegramente al violín, Kreisler realizó numerosas adaptaciones para violín y obras propias en estilo de diferentes compositores. Algunas de ellas pasaban como obras originales de otros autores. En este disco se nos presentan adaptaciones para violín y piano de temas de Paganini, extraídos unos de conciertos para violín y orquesta y otros de caprichos para violín solo. En el caso de los caprichos se pierde un poco la vigorosidad y fuerza además de emplear tempos muy lentos en pro de una música más amable al estilo de la música de salón; ya sabemos que Kreisler era un especialista en pequeñas piezas de este tipo. El arrebato del violín solo, su inmensa capacidad para mostrarnos por sí mismo la fuerza expresiva que posee, quedan amortiguadas con las armonías del piano que en definitiva no hace más que un simple acompañamiento. Aquí es donde Paganini fue más honesto, en sus caprichos para violín solo, y no quiso que otros músicos se aburrieran acompañando los fuegos de artificio de un violín exultante.
Nuevamente escuchamos al violinista Philippe Quint en el sello Naxos y nos alegra este nuevo trabajo.
more....
Review By Brian Reinhart ,MusicWeb International,November 2010
Here is a meeting of two unlikely minds: Niccolò Paganini, the ultimate showman, the first rock star, the man who brought virtuoso solo playing to new, undreamed-of heights, and Fritz Kreisler, the suave gentleman with a genius for salon music and miniatures. And yet Kreisler arranged a series of Paganini’s works for violin and piano, both works which were originally for orchestra (like ‘La Campanella’ or ‘Le streghe’) and works which were originally for violin alone (like the selected caprices). This is a recital consisting entirely of such arrangements, and Paganini fans will want to have it, but its appeal will also extend to violin aficionados generally.
Alongside Hyperion’s “Romantic Concerto” series, the less evocatively named Naxos series “Nineteenth Century Violin Music” is one of the greatest gifts to violin enthusiasts in many a year. Announced in 2007, the series aims to include major (and, frankly, minor) works by the likes of Charles-August de Bériot, Pierre Baillot, Rodolphe Kreutzer, Jenő Hubay, Antonio Bazzini, Jan Kalliwoda, and Ferdinand David, as well as the complete works of Henri Vieuxtemps and Pablo de Sarasate. Grammy-nominated violinist Philippe Quint has been an enthusiastic member of the project, having previously recorded a slate of Beriot concertos. Now, with the Paganini/Kreisler transcriptions, he reaches an intriguing medium between the famous and the obscure. This is familiar music in an unfamiliar frame.
Some works are more popular than others: ‘La Campanella’ and the twenty-fourth caprice are justly legendary, while the somewhat long-winded variations on Rossini tunes have been consigned to the footnotes of music history. Philippe Quint tackles them all with freshness, dazzling technique, and a tone which is a little brighter and thinner than I like. He cannot make satisfying the structures of the variations (which were, frankly, built to show off Paganini’s skills to best advantage), but he can dispatch their double stops, multiple extended harmonic passages, and occasional expressive demands seemingly without any difficulty. As I write this, I am listening to the Moto perpetuo and wondering not just how anyone can play this music, but how anyone can make it sound so easy.
The twenty-fourth caprice is one of the most interesting tracks: Kreisler could not help but write some variations of his own! The booklet helpfully explains which of Paganini’s variations have been replaced by Kreisler’s new inventions, which are all worthy of joining the originals—and some of them are tougher to play: try 0:53!. Pianist Dmitry Cogan even gets his own mini-variation (2:18), a welcome moment at the surface after spending most of the disc submerged beneath a sea of virtuosic violin writing. Is it just me, or do the capacious chords of that little piano solo invoke another composer associated with this tune: Rachmaninoff?
The Caprice No 20 in D begins as a surprisin
more....
Review By Duncan Druce,Gramophone,November 2010
Paganini got it right the first time—Kreisler’s arrangements miss the mark
Like most people interested in string playing, I’m a keen admirer of Fritz Kreisler: of the communicative power of his violin playing, preserved through his many recordings, and of his own short pieces, treasured by violinists ever since his day. I’m less sure about Kreisler the arranger, and I certainly don’t think any of these Paganini rewrites improves on the original. In La campanella, Paganini’s rondo form is unbalanced by being shorn of its second episode, and Kreisler’s enriched harmonisation of the theme, while undoubtedly ingenious, adds a touch of queasy sentimentality to Paganini’s bright, direct setting. Similarly, the piano parts for the Caprices have the effect of making the music softer and prettier—not to its advantage. In No 20, Paganini’s folk-style drone is overlaid with an elaborate, chromatic accompaniment that takes the music into a different era. Kreisler’s version of No 24 is a strange hybrid, retaining only a few of Paganini’s variations on the famous theme, but adding several of his own. The other variation pieces fare better in that there are fewer harmonic changes, but in each case Kreisler tinkers with the form—omitting variations, adding cadenzas. The effect for me is to strengthen my admiration for Paganini the composer—he gets it right, and doesn’t need anyone to make “improvements”.
This is all the more sad because Philippe Quint is an excellent Paganini player—his technique is up to the mark, with alluring tone quality and expressive, stylish playing of the quasi-operatic cantabile music. I look forward to some genuine Paganini from him.
more....
Review By Edith Eisler,Strings Magazine,October 2010
Only a virtuoso would dare take on these pieces, composed by Nicolò Paganini and arranged by Fritz Kreisler—violinist Philippe Quint is fully equal to their challenges. Trained in his native Russia and in New York, where he now lives, he has performed worldwide on stage, radio, and television.
Two of his recordings, which include concertos by Ned Rorem and Miklós Rózsa, have received Grammy Award nominations.
This record concentrates on bravura display that leaves no violinistic resource unexplored: harmonics; left-hand pizzicato; double-, triple- and quadruple-stops; staccato; ricochet; and, of course, running passages at hair-raising speeds, especially in the Moto perpetuo.
His pure tone can be both sonorous and radiant—its only flaw is a fast, never-changing vibrato.
The program features “La campanella,” the finale of Paganini’s Second Violin Concerto; variations on themes from two Rossini operas and from a ballet by Mozart’s pupil Süssmayr, where Quint spins long singing lines in true bel canto style; and three caprices, including the famous No. 24, a set of variations whose theme inspired many later composers.
Kreisler “arranged” these pieces mainly by substituting his own music for sections he had altered or cut. His real contribution was providing sometimes overly elaborate piano parts for the unaccompanied caprices, and replacing Paganini’s rather naïve accompaniments for the rest with more sophisticated ones.
A disc for aficionados of fine fiddling.
more....
Review By ,WQXR (New York),September 2010
Philippe Quint’s approach favors a bit more romantic expressivity as he glides through Kreisler’s violin and piano arrangements. Included here are two-large scale sets of variations based on themes of Rossini operas, La campanella and several Caprices. There’s more sonic variety in Kreisler arrangements but also a schmaltzier quality that might seem dated to some listeners. Still, the real point of comparison comes in No. 24. Quint’s version has a certain period charm but also power: the control of the bow in staccato runs is breathtaking.
Review By ,Infodad.com,September 2010
The effectiveness of Philippe Quint and Dmitriy Cogan should not be doubted for a moment...Fritz Kreisler’s revisions of Paganini’s works were designed to highlight Kreisler’s own distinctive style of violin virtuosity at the expense of many of Paganini’s innovations. Kreisler, for example, was fond of artificial harmonics, which he introduced into several of the pieces heard here. He was not fond of scordatura, which was a primary Paganini technique (most famously in his Violin Concerto No. 1), so Kreisler simply took it out when making these arrangements. There is plenty of virtuosity here—Moto perpetuo, in particular, is astonishingly well played, with Quint continuing at a breakneck pace no matter how often it seems that he cannot possibly keep it up. And there is some interesting treatment of the three more-extended works on the CD: Introduction and Variations on “Non più mesta” from Rossini’s “La Cenerentola,” Introduction and Variations on “Di tanti palpiti” from Rossini’s “Tancredi,” and—most of all—the simply titled but notoriously difficult Le streghe (“The Witches”). Still, most of the interest lies in what Paganini created, not in what Kreisler did to modify the earlier master’s work. This is even truer in the shorter pieces, which include three of the 24 Caprices, Op. 1 (Nos. 13, 20 and 24) and the “La Campanella” finale from Violin Concerto No. 2. Quint plays everything extremely well—he must be quite something to watch when doing works like these in concert—and Cogan backs him up admirably even though, in truth, he does not have much to do (Kreisler gave the piano accompanist only minimal chances to shine). It is certainly understandable that Kreisler, who performed mainly in the 20th century, would want to put his personal stamp on music created by one of the greatest violinists of the 19th.
more....
Review By C. Michael Bailey,All About Jazz,September 2010
A modern parallel to the Romantic period relationship of Nicolo Paganini and Fritz Kreisler might be guitarists Jimi Hendrix and Stevie Ray Vaughan. The younger men of the pairs arranged and played the music of the older musicians, adding their own shine to the compositions. Everyone in the quartet was a showman in the extreme. But the genesis of such behavior in performers began with Paganini and his buddy Franz Liszt. Paganini was a mercurial enigma, whose violin talent continues to look for a peer 170 years after his death. During his lifetime, Paganini knew his talent and composed toward it, his Opus 1 Caprices being the ultimate solo showpieces that he played with demonic relish in concert.
A century later, a violinist with none too shabby a reputation arrived in Fritz Kreisler, whose incandescent playing is perhaps the best, if not simply the most extroverted, of the modern era. Kreisler was impressed with his talent also, so much so, he arranged several Paganini warhorses for his own performance. Highlighted here is his arrangement of the most famous Caprice of all, “The Number 24 in A minor.” Russian Philippe Quint’s performance is like that of a Steve Vai or Zack Wylde, so rife with technique that the violinist threatens to overpower the piece with his fireworks. Where he is successful is in not doing so, producing a performance that is a high-wire act without a net. The danger and threat are palpable, while Paganini smiles—pinned to some crag in Hell.
more....
Review By James Manheim,Allmusic.com,September 2010
Fritz Kreisler’s arrangements of music by Niccolò Paganini do not have the consistent conceptual basis of some of his other music. Instead, they replace Paganini’s virtuoso effects with others that, one assumes, played to Kreisler’s strengths. Generally speaking, they rely less on pure fire and more on exotic effects. There are three large variation sets included, and all three include remarkable passages in harmonics that replace parallel sections in the originals. Kreisler seems less fond of octaves than Paganini, and more fond of lengthy triple-stopped (and even quadruple-stopped—hear the conclusion of Le streghe, Op. 8, [track 6]) passages. Most of the available Kreisler recordings seem to focus on the same set of sentimental favorites, and this disc helps flesh out the legacy of this fascinating figure. It might be objected that Russian-American violinist Philippe Quint doesn’t sound much like Kreisler; he tones down Kreisler’s characteristic mid-tone warble. But these are lively performances in which Quint does well to sacrifice perfect tonal precision for expressivity, and he is supported by expressive playing from accompanist Dmitri Cogan. Fine acoustics from the CBC’s Glenn Gould Studio in Toronto are a plus. Recommended for Kreisler fans.
more....