Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
The Reminiscences of Sherlock Holmes –
His Last Bow
Was Conan Doyle paranoid? Judging by the
set of six stories first published in The Strand
as ‘Reminiscences of Sherlock Holmes, one
might think so. Intrigue, espionage, revenge,
foreign agents, even the Mafia make their
appearance within the British Isles, and
provide a colourful backdrop to this collection
that appeared between 1908 and 1913.
Times had changed in the five years since
Conan Doyle had last entered the world of
221B Baker Street. Now in 1908, the height
of the Edwardian age, technology was
advancing—the motor-car, for instance, was
becoming almost commonplace. Conan
Doyle revelled in cars, and was one of the first
drivers in the country to receive a fine for
speeding. Indeed, some thought the world
was moving too fast. In 1912, the best
example of British engineering expertise
resulted in tragedy. The liner The Titanic was
defeated by nature, when a collision with an
iceberg led to her sinking with a huge loss of
life. In the blaming and name-calling that
followed, Conan Doyle valiantly supported
the man who stood most accused—the
Captain.
The Titanic disaster shook British
confidence, and with the growth of
Germany’s ambitions, the seemingly
impregnable British Empire began to look as
if it might be under threat. So Conan Doyle’s
stories, though set in the 1890s, the late
years of the Victorian era, accurately reflect
the fears and insecurities of the rapidly
changing first decade of the twentieth
century.
Since he had last written of Sherlock
Holmes in 1903, there had been changes
too in Conan Doyle’s own life. His first wife
having died in 1906, his affair with Jean
Leckie that had continued to be platonic
whilst he nursed his sick wife, was now at
last able to be made public. Conan Doyle
married Jean Leckie in 1907, and such was
his celebrity that even as far afield as the
Buenos Aires Standard, there was a
headline: ‘Sherlock Holmes quietly married.’
Yes, the shadow of his greatest creation still
fell across everything he attempted to do in
life. But Conan Doyle seems, by 1908 to
have finally come to terms with the
situation; his new wife was more important to him now. More at ease with his fictional
sleuth, Doyle even seems to have tried to
emulate him by turning his attention to reallife
criminal cases, and offering his help to
the defendants, whom he felt were the
subjects of a miscarriage of justice. In 1906
he had helped an Asian solicitor, George
Edalji, wrongfully accused of maiming
animals and writing poison pen letters.
Evidence of racism had led to his conviction.
After his release he appealed for justice, and
Conan Doyle taking up the challenge
proved that Edalji’s poor eyesight made his
committing of the crime next to impossible.
Again in 1912 he metaphorically
donned his deer-stalker and came to the aid
of Oscar Slater, a young Jew imprisoned for
the murder of an elderly spinster in Glasgow
in 1908. Conan Doyle found the evidence
against Slater extremely flimsy and thought
it reflected the anti-semitic feelings
prevalent in Britain before the First World
War. He worked hard to get his conviction
reversed, which did not in fact happen until
1927.
Both cases created a lot of publicity but
were only a limited success. If he couldn’t
actually be Sherlock Holmes, as the public
seemed to expect, he could at least continue
to write about him, which after 1908, he did
less reluctantly than in the past.
The Adventure of Wisteria Lodge
South American revolutionaries invade the
quiet environs of Esher, Surrey, in this story,
set in 1892. The Central American state of
‘San Pedro’ is fictitious—the colours of the
flag too, green and white, do not
correspond with any country or state in
South America—but almost any of that
continent’s republics could have been
Conan Doyle’s model. Cruel tyrants
overthrown by popular revolutions were
only too frequent in Central America’s
history throughout the nineteenth century.
There were heroes too; men such as Simon
Bolivar are revered in South America as its
great liberator, or San Martin and O’Higgins
who liberated and reformed Chile and
Argentina. But many South American
governments were unstable and
economically weak, which made them easy
prey to bloody tyrants like Juan Manuel de
Rosas who ruled Argentina from 1835 to
1852, and could well have been the
inspiration for Don Murillo in this story.
Furthering his own ambitions, though
nominally supporting federalism (the linking
of the Central American republics in a
common policy), de Rosas assumed the
dictatorship of most of Argentina in 1835.
He was a ruthless tyrant. Assisted by spies,
propagandists and the Mazorca (a secret
political society that degenerated into a band of assassins) he instituted a regime of
terror. Many revolutions were organised
against his rule. Secret revolutionary groups
were formed—notably the Asociacion de
Mayo, founded by Echeverria Esteban.
Esteban, perhaps the model for Garcia in
this story, was a romantic poet and political
revolutionary, in the mode of Lord Byron.
After a successful revolution in1852, the
dictator de Rosas fled to England, like
Murillo, though not to Esher, and lived in
England as an exile until his death.
Conan Doyle adds further spice to his
story by including references to voodoo,
though Holmes’s textbook on the subject
which sounds impressive: Eckermann’s
Voodooism and the Negroid Religions is
entirely fictitious. This story may contain the
earliest literary reference to voodoo.
This story only received its title, The
Adventure of Wisteria Lodge when it was
published in book form. In the original
Strand publication the first part of the story
was entitled, The Singular Experience of Mr.
Scott Eccles; and the second part, The Tiger
of San Pedro.
The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans
Anti-German feelings were growing
throughout the first decade of the
Twentieth Century. In The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans set in 1895, but
written in 1908, Conan Doyle focuses on
the important role submarines might play in
any forthcoming conflict. It was a far-seeing
vision for the time; and Doyle went on to
develop this theme in his short story
‘Danger’ written in 1914—on the eve of
World War I. In that story he predicted that
a foreign power’s submarines would be
capable of paralysing England’s merchant
ships supplying essential foods to the United
Kingdom. The Admiralty considered the
scenario to be ridiculous: ‘I do not think that
any civilised nation will torpedo unarmed
and defenceless merchant ships,’ said one
Admiral. ‘I do not think that territorial
waters will be violated, or neutral vessels
sunk…’ said another. They had to eat their
words when in 1915, the Lusitaniawas sunk
by a German U-boat, only one of many less
publicised victims of a fierce submarine
warfare that developed rapidly once war
was declared. There was a report that the
German High Command had been inspired
by Conan Doyle’s story to attack merchant
shipping, but this was more likely to be a
clever piece of propaganda.
The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington
Plans, is popular amongst railway
enthusiasts as a significant part of the
investigation takes place among the
subterranean tunnels of the London Underground system. It is surprising to learn
that the Underground system was in
existence at such an early date—the first
journey was made between Paddington and
Farringdon in 1863. Baedeker’s Guide to
London for 1883 eloquently states: ‘An
important artery of ‘intramural’ traffic is
afforded by the Metropolitan and
Metropolitan and District Railways. These
lines which for the most part run under the
houses and streets by means of tunnels, and
partly also through cuttings between high
walls, form an almost complete belt (the
‘inner’ circle) round the whole of the inner
part of London, while various branch-lines
diverge to the outlying suburbs…The
Metropolitan Railway Company now
conveys about 70 million passengers
annually, or nearly one and a half million per
week, at an average rate of about twopence
per journey.’ The Metropolitan line was the
first to offer a regular service, and included
Baker Street amongst its stations, opened in
1868. Though Holmes and Watson no
doubt took advantage of its close proximity,
the possibility of delays in a tunnel whilst
pursuing a suspect made the swiftness of a
hansom cab infinitely preferable. It makes
one shudder also to remember that until the
end of the nineteenth century underground
trains were steam-driven. The smoke and
airlessness must have been intolerable. The pollution was taken for granted, and only
warrants a passing mention whilst Holmes
and Watson are at 13 Caulfield Gardens:
‘Holmes swept his light along the window
sill. It was thickly coated with soot from the
passing engines.’
In this story, once again we meet
Mycroft Holmes, Sherlock’s elder brother,
for only the third time in the canon; previous
encounters being in The Adventure of the
Greek Interpreter and The Adventure of the
Final Problem. In keeping with Conan
Doyle’s wish to raise the temperature of his
stories, he allows Sherlock to reveal the true
extent of Mycroft’s involvement in the
complicated foreign policy of the British
government: ‘He is the British government,’
Holmes tells Watson, and with his
knowledge too of every foreign agent living
in London, it is not beyond the bounds of
belief that Mycroft was responsible for
setting up MI6!
The uncomfortable fact, that the spy
Oberstein escapes the hangman, despite
murdering in cold blood poor patriotic
Cadogan West, and serves instead a 15 year
sentence in a British prison smacks of a
rotten deal being struck in the murky world
of international espionage. Did Oberstein
offer information on foreign plans and plots
in exchange for his life? If so, it would not
be a surprise if the deal had been brokered by that arch-diplomat Mycroft Holmes!
Holmes states once again that as far as
detective work goes he plays ‘the game for
the game’s own sake,’ but often, in lieu of a
fee, he accepted a gift. In this case, ‘a
remarkably fine emerald tie-pin’ from ‘a
certain gracious lady.’ Sometimes Watson’s
discretion goes too far; it is obvious in lieu of
the fact that Holmes has just done a great
service to his country that the ‘gracious lady’
is Queen Victoria herself.
The Adventure of the Devil’s Foot
This case dates from 1897, and it is shocking
to find Holmes being told in no uncertain
terms by a Harley Street specialist either to
take a holiday or suffer the consequences!
Holmes’s collapse is caused by a combination
of hard work and ‘occasional indiscretions of
his own’, the faithful Watson informs us. Was
it his repeated recourse to cocaine over the
years that was now finally undermining his
iron constitution? Watson had stated in The
Adventure of the Missing Three-Quarter that
‘the fiend was not dead but sleeping…and
the waking near.’ Twice in this collection of
stories does Holmes refer to his mind as
racing—‘tearing itself to pieces’ (The
Adventure of Wisteria Lodge, and The
Adventure of The Devil’s Foot)—could this be
an indication of the effects of cocaine? By the
period of this adventure, Holmes had been addicted to the drug for a number of years
but it is also possible, in the light of events in
this story, that the curious chemist in Holmes
had led him to experiment with even more
lethal substances, in the cause of scientific
discovery. After Watson narrowly saves both
their lives, during Holmes’s experiment with
the eponymous deadly drug, did he recall the
words of his medical friend Stamford about
Holmes’s irrational behaviour, when he had
introduced them to each other all those years
ago? ‘I could well imagine,’ observed
Stamford, ‘his giving a friend a little pinch of
the latest vegetable alkaloid, not out of
malevolence, but simply out of a spirit of
inquiry in order to have an accurate idea of
the effects.’ Little did Watson realise at that
point the dangerous and exciting turn his life
was to take.
Holmes is probably not yet fifty at the
time of this collapse, but Conan Doyle is
preparing the reader for the idea of
Holmes’s imminent retirement. Indeed,
when published in book form in 1917,
Watson included a preface in which he
states that Holmes is enjoying a happy
retirement on the Sussex Downs. No more
dramatic disappearances over the edge of
precipitous cliffs for his creation, instead
Doyle allowed Holmes to slip quietly away to
a well-earned rest.
In this story, Dr Leon Sterndale, ‘the great lion hunter and explorer,’ seems to be
a blueprint for Conan Doyle’s later more
famous creation Professor Challenger, the
irascible leader of the expedition to The Lost
World. Sterndale has ‘a huge body and
deeply-seamed face. fierce eyes…hawk-like
nose…grizzled hair and beard’, and
Challenger is similarly described. He made
his first appearance in 1912, just two years
after this story was first published. But
eminent scientist and anthropologist though
he is, why does Holmes allow him to walk
away free after murdering a man with the
most horrific tortures? Howsoever
Sterndale’s act may be justified as revenge,
Holmes nevertheless flouts the law and
decides to play judge and jury himself, as in
The Adventure of the Abbey Grange. His
nervous illness could be cited as affecting his
judgement perhaps, but this is not an
isolated incident in the canon, and what
excuse is there for the other occasions?
The deadly poison Radix pedis diaboli
obtained ‘under very extraordinary
circumstances in the Ubanghi country’ by
Dr Sterndale still remains unknown to
medical science—though research since
1897 has shown, with regard to its
hallucinatory properties, that it has
similarities with a more recent discovery, the
drug LSD.
The Adventure of the Red Circle
Despite being set in the heart of
Bloomsbury, there is a distinctly American
flavour to this story. The sinister shadow of
the Italian Mafia looms over it, counteracted
by a brief glimpse of the detective of the
future, Mr.Leverton, of Pinkerton’s American
Agency. Here Conan Doyle is cleverly
blending fact with fiction, Pinkerton’s was
just as real an institution as the Mafia. The
Scottish-American Allan Pinkerton founded
his National Detective Agency in Chicago in
1850. One of its earliest successes was the
foiling of an assassination attempt on
President Lincoln in 1861. The Agency’s
motto was ‘we never sleep’ and their logo
was an open unblinking eye—hence the
nickname for their agents, ‘private eyes.’
Pinkerton dreamed that one day his
organisation would achieve world-wide
control. Its efficiency inspired the founding
of a similar body, the FBI, which eventually
superseded it. Pinkerton invented the ‘mug
shot’ and developed a file system on
criminals that was the envy of the world’s
police forces. They were relentless in their
pursuit of criminals, and Leverton in
following Gorgiano across the Atlantic to
London is typical. Pinkerton’s Agency was
eager to create links with European forces,
such as Scotland Yard in this case, thus
creating an international exchange of information and assistance, anticipating
Interpol. Holmes would have been very
impressed with the efficiency of Pinkerton’s
as their methods so closely mirrored his own
approach. He was always eager to keep
ahead of developments in the science of
detection, and it is impressive in this case
that he shows he is familiar with the latest
thinking with regard to fingerprints. It was
Sir Francis Galton, in 1888, who whilst
studying fingerprints as a key to race and
heredity, noticed that prints remained
constant throughout an individual’s life and
that no two prints were alike. His findings
published in 1892 led to finger-printing
being adopted by the CID, in 1901. This
case takes place in 1902, which shows how
up-to-date Holmes’s information is, though
as early as 1895, in The Adventure of the
Norwood Builder he claimed to ‘have heard
something’ about no two thumb-prints ever
being alike.
In later life, Pinkerton took to writing
detective stories—one wonders if he had
heard of Sherlock Holmes and what he
thought of him.
The history of ‘The Red Circle’—a
branch of the Mafia-is so graphically told by
Signora Lucca that one is inevitably
reminded of Mario Puzo’s Mafia novel, and
subsequent film, The Godfather.
The Disappearance of Lady Frances Carfax
In this story, Holmes gives Watson another
chance, as he had done in The Hound of the
Baskervilles, to polish his powers of
detection and collect information about the
case at first hand. As in The Hound of the
Baskervilles, it also gives Holmes the
opportunity to criticise poor Watson’s efforts
and make a dramatic appearance, in
disguise, to save Watson from getting a
good hiding from his chief suspect. Holmes
himself is not at his sparkling best in this
story, a fact he admits himself when he tells
Watson that should he chronicle these
events, ‘it can only be as an example of that
temporary eclipse to which even the bestbalanced
mind may be exposed.’ Perhaps it
is his dislike of Lady Frances’s type that
hinders him: ‘one of the most dangerous
classes in the world is the drifting and
friendless woman—an inciter of crime in
others.’ Holmes’s renowned misogyny is
certainly given full reign in this story.
Watson at least got a good holiday out
of the case, Lausanne being a major centre
for wealthy British tourists, with its own
branch of Cook’s travel office. Thomas Cook
had developed his travel company, which
had begun when he organised a humble
train trip in Loughborough for a Temperance
group in 1841, and grew to provide tickets and hotels to virtually anywhere in the world
for the Victorian traveller. The company
exists to this day. On the subject of hotels,
the Langham in Portland Place, London,
which the Hon. Philip Green gives as his
address, and was frequented by the Prince
of Wales, is now fully restored to its
Edwardian glory, and once more an hotel,
after years of neglect while serving as offices
for the BBC.
Lady Frances’s ordeal calls to mind a
story by Edgar Allan Poe, one of Conan
Doyle’s mentors, entitled The Premature
Burial (1844).
Lady Frances seems to have been easy
prey for the ruthless Dr Shlessinger. For a
woman who ‘found her comfort and
occupation in religion’ she does not seem to
be well-versed in the Bible, for Dr
Shlessinger claimed to be working on a map
of the Holy Land, ‘with special reference to
the kingdom of the Midianites.’ The
Midianites were a nomadic tribe, with tribal
chiefs, not kings, and no settled territory.
Holmes and Watson too missed this vital
piece of deception in the evidence or they
too might have rumbled that the Doctor
was a fraud more quickly. There is no
evidence in the entire canon that Holmes
and Watson were regular church-goers!
The Adventure of the Dying Detective
This is a surprisingly early case to be included
in this collection, for Watson states
categorically that it took place in the second
year of his marriage, when he was no longer
residing at Baker Street, which would make
it 1888 or 1889. Judging by the appalling
way Holmes treats his closest friend in this
story, it is not perhaps surprising that
Watson resisted writing the case up until
1913—twenty five years later! It tells us a lot
about the steadfastness of the Doctor’s
friendship for Holmes that it survived
beyond this case, for Holmes appears to
think so little of Watson’s discretion that he
feels he must deceive his old friend with a
pretended illness. True, he pays the Doctor a
handsome compliment to his medical
expertise when the case is over: ‘Could I
fancy that your astute judgement would
pass a dying man who, however weak, had
no rise of pulse or temperature?’—but this
is not an isolated example of his seeming
lack of care for his friend’s feelings. After
Holmes’s escape from the Reichenbach Falls,
he made no attempt to get in touch with
Watson who was left to mourn for 3 years
convinced that his friend had perished.
Holmes may have considered Watson
incapable of dissimulation, as he explains in
this case, and therefore wasn’t prepared to compromise his safety, but too often he
plays fast and loose with his friend’s feelings.
In The Adventure of the Devil’s Foot he
comes close to killing both himself and his
friend (see notes above), and we are
reminded once again how amazingly
accurate Watson’s friend Stamford is in
assessing Holmes character: ‘Holmes is a
little too scientific for my tastes—it
approaches to cold-bloodedness…’
If Watson is occasionally tetchy with
Holmes, it is, in view of the cavalier treatment
he has received, forgivable. Let us not forget
too, the long-suffering Mrs.Hudson, who is
also duped by Holmes in this story. Let’s hope
that the ‘princely sum’ paid by Holmes for the
privilege of sharing her premises was subject
to a substantial increase by way of
compensation for housing the ‘very worst
tenant in London.’
In this story, Holmes indulges his
histrionic skills and love of disguise. His
realistic make-up as an invalid, and his flair
for a melodramatic denouement to this and
many another story, make one wonder if at
any time he trod the boards professionally. It
is no mean achievement to act convincingly
off the stage, in real life.
Holmes blinds poor old Watson with his
own science: the doctor is unlikely to have
treated anyone in his Kensington practice for
‘Tapanuli fever’ or ‘black Formosa corruption’. Although these diseases sound suspiciously
fictitious, they are in fact a form of scrub
typhus, found in tropical countries and caught
from the bite of infected mites. The symptoms
are very close to those assumed by Holmes:
black encrusted lesions, fever, swollen glands,
delirium etc. It would seem that Dr Conan
Doyle had been consulting his medical
dictionary for inspiration.
After starving himself in a good cause,
Holmes suggests that ‘something nutritious
at Simpson’s would not be out of place.’
This classic London restaurant is one of the
few Sherlockian haunts that is happily still
with us—now known as Simpson’s–in-the-Strand, it is quite an exclusive establishment,
but in Holmes’s day was an economical
choice. Dinner from the joint was 2s 6d
(about 12p today), or a fishdinner 2s 9d
(under 15p). Let us hope that Holmes footed
the bill by way of compensation for his
treatment of the faithful Doctor; and
splashed out on a bottle of Liebfraumilch to
celebrate the end of a successful case,
which would have set him back a mere 12
shillings ( approx. 60p.)
His Last Bow
And so we come to the inevitable—the last
case for Sherlock Holmes. It is set on August
2nd. 1914, the day World War I began.
Conan Doyle’s fear of foreign spies and agents that is the constant theme of the
stories published between 1908 and 1913
has proved to be real, and German spies are
established on the South Coast of England.
The story was written and published in The
Strand in 1917, when England had been at
war with Germany for 3 years, and the forces
of both sides were locked in a seemingly
endless stalemate. The German Secretary of
War, in that same year, had paid an
unwelcome tribute to Arthur Conan Doyle:
‘The only prophet of the present economic
war was the novelist Conan Doyle.’
Ever the optimist, Conan Doyle once
again turned to his great creation, Sherlock
Holmes as the only man who could inspire a
dispirited nation. ‘There’s an east wind
coming,’ Holmes says to Watson at the end
of this story, ‘such a wind as never blew on
England yet…a good many of us may wither
before its blast. But it’s God’s own wind
none the less, and a cleaner, better, stronger
land will lie in the sunshine when the storm
has cleared.’ The rhetoric is positively
Churchillian. We learn that since 1903,
Holmes has been in retirement on the
Sussex Downs, having exchanged the study
of the criminal mind, for the study of bees.
At the call however from his country’s
premier—Mr Herbert Asquith, presumably—Holmes has responded, and for a period of
two years has been building a credible identity for himself in the United States as a
disenchanted Irish-American, willing to spy
for the Kaiser.
Holmes’s services are required not as a
detective in this story, but as a spy. It would
seem that since his retirement he has
changed job description, which is no doubt
due to the influence of his brother Mycroft
who would surely have recruited Holmes
into MI6 soon after its creation in 1909. This
story is narrated in the third person, and
some commentators believe it is the voice of
Mycroft, whose intimate knowledge of the
world of espionage would make him a
suitable man to record these important
world events. So, although Holmes may
have officially retired (which may be just a
blind for the curious), and this is his last
recorded case, there would have been
plenty of work for him in the secret service
between the years 1914 to 1918, despite his
advancing years.
This is the only story in the canon which
mentions Holmes’s age. Disguised as the
Irish-American, he is described as ‘a tall
gaunt man of 60’, whilst Watson is a
‘heavily built, elderly man with a grey
moustache.’ The world has moved on since
their days of glory in the 1890s, and Conan
Doyle does not wish his heroes to be
preserved in aspic, forever young. As if to
emphasise this point, this story records Holmes’s only ride in a car, that symbol of
the 20th. century, and Watson is the driver.
Taking up driving so late in life has probably
led to Watson being less active and
consequently ‘heavily built.’ However, age
apart, the two, despite being in their
seventh decade, are able to deal physically
with Von Bork, and Watson, according to
Holmes is even considering offering his
services again to the war department—there seems to be no sign of his retiring—good old Watson!
But for all its attempts to lead the reader
forward into a ‘changing world’ for Holmes
and Watson, there is also an air of nostalgia,
as old cases are recalled (The Adventure of
the Scandal in Bohemia) and old opponents (Professor Moriarty)—and is it too much to
think that Conan Doyle was beginning to
identify more closely with Sherlock after all
the years of antagonism towards him? Why
else would he choose his father’s middle
name ‘Altamont’ as the pseudonym Holmes
assumes when a spy? It’s as if he’s become
one of the family.
Conan Doyle wrote another Holmes
novel, The Valley of Fear in 1915, and far
from closing the file on Holmes and Watson
after their War Service, he went on to write
another twelve short stories, published as
The Casebook of Sherlock Holmes in 1927.
Notes by David Timson
The music on this recording is taken from the NAXOS catalogue
MENDELSSOHN
Scherzo in A minor Op 81 No 2 / String Quartet No 2 in A minor Op 13 /
String Quartet No 5 in E flat major Op 44 No 3
8.550863
Aurora String Quartet
MENDELSSOHN String Quartet in No 3 in D major Op 44 No 1 / Cappriccio in E minor Op 81 No 3
8.550861
Aurora String Quartet
MENDELSSOHN String Quartet No 4 in E minor Op 44 No 2
8.550862
Aurora String Quartet