Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
The Return of Sherlock Holmes III
With The Adventure of the Second Stain, included in this selection, Doyle’s reluctant
return to 221b Baker Street drew to a close,
he hoped for ever. Having succumbed to
the public demand for his most famous
creation, by bringing Sherlock Holmes back
from beyond the grave, Doyle went on to
prove that he had lost none of his powers
when it came to creating a story full of
suspense and mystery. There are thirteen
stories in this series, first published in ‘The
Strand’ magazine between 1903 and 1904,
and published in book-form in 1905 as ‘The
Return of Sherlock Holmes’.
But had the original Sherlock Holmes
returned? In this set of stories he is
unpredictable, and given to signs of
emotion and strain. Doyle seems to dwell
on the weaknesses of his detective, perhaps
to deter his adoring public from wanting yet
more. Thus Holmes’ ambiguous attitude to
the ‘powerful and wealthy’ is referred to by
Watson in The Adventure of Black Peter—yet we have seen him happily pocket a
cheque for £6,000 from the Duke of
Holdernesse in The Adventure of the Priory School. Is this hypocrisy? Or just Doyle
reminding us, through the voice of Watson,
that Holmes can be practical when it comes
to fees, but is essentially a bohemian, and
‘like all great artists, lived for his art’s sake’.
Likewise, Watson refers in The Adventure
of the Missing Three-Quarter, to Holmes’s
‘sleeping fiend’ of cocaine addiction;
the dark streak that runs beneath all
these stories, reminding us that Holmes
is unconventional, unpredictable, and
dangerous. At times he even defies the law
he works to uphold: ‘Once or twice in my
career I feel that I have done more real harm
by my discovery of the criminal than ever he
had done by his crime,’ Holmes says in The
Adventure of the Abbey Grange, ‘I have
learned caution now, and I had rather play
tricks with the law of England than with
my own conscience.’ So, listening to his
conscience, he allows the criminal in that
story to walk away.
Would the public turn against their hero
if Doyle showed them Holmes had feet of
clay? The change was not unnoticed. Doyle
gleefully reported in an article for ‘The Strand’ that a Cornish fisherman had
remarked to him that ‘when Mr Holmes had
that fall he may not have been killed, but he
was certainly injured, for he was never the
same afterwards.’
The Adventure of Black Peter
In this story of an old sea-salt murdered
with his own harpoon, Doyle draws upon
his youthful experiences aboard an Arctic
whaling ship. In 1880, whilst still a medical
student, he had signed up to join the
whaler Hope as ship’s surgeon, bound on a
seven-month voyage into the Arctic. He
didn’t do much in the way of surgery, but
he enjoyed to the full the rough-and-tumble
life of a whaler: boxing in the evenings,
learning to harpoon and telling tales to the
ship’s crew. The experience stayed with him
for the rest of his life and the haunting
world of the frozen wastes of the Arctic
contributes to the atmosphere in Black
Peter. The convincing portrait of the hardbitten
whaler, Patrick Cairns, must have
come from life.
But what became of Cairns? Watson
fails to tell us whether he was found guilty
of murder. Cairns insists it was a just killing,
self-defence, though he could not deny the
charge of blackmail if it were pressed against him. It is uncharacteristic on Doyle’s
part for the reader not to be told the
outcome of a case.
We are also introduced for the first time
to Holmes’s protégé, Inspector Stanley
Hopkins. Never one to have a high opinion
of the official police force, Holmes
nevertheless gives a great deal of time to
this young man; he appears in no less than
three cases in The Return of Sherlock
Holmes. Perhaps to Holmes, he is the son he
never had; and maybe Doyle wants to show
that Holmes, far from being a machine, has
a human side after all, and wants to pass on
his accumulated knowledge to the next
generation. Holmes is a severe teacher,
however, not averse to ticking Hopkins off if
he disappoints:
Hopkins: ‘There were no footmarks.’
Holmes: ‘My good Hopkins, I have
investigated many crimes, but I have
never yet seen one which was
committed by a flying creature.’
The story also ends curiously with
Holmes’s enigmatic reference to Watson
and he being in Norway—is this perhaps a
joke, as Norway was one of the main
starting points for whaling trips into the Arctic Circle? Or is Holmes anticipating that
the King of Scandinavia will soon have
another delicate case for him to handle, as
he did at the time of The Adventure of the
Final Problem ?
The Adventure of the Golden Pince-Nez
This case occurred during one of the busiest
periods of Holmes’s career. He was at the
height of his fame, and Watson has barely
had time to jot down notes on the stream
of cases that came to Baker Street. What
wouldn’t the literary world give to have
Watson’s account of the case of ‘the red
leech and terrible death of Crosby the
banker’; or to know just what exactly the
Ancient British barrow contained; or the
capture of Huret, the Boulevard assassin—an event so momentous that Holmes was
given la Légion d’honneur by the French
President. But, alas, we are destined merely
to be tantalised by Watson’s list (referred to
in this and other stories) that will now never
be written or read.
In this story, as in many others, we
notice just how commonplace smoking in
public places was a century ago, though we
should remember that the Victorians did
segregate smokers from non-smokers in public houses, with separate bars. No man
who wished to be considered a gentleman
would smoke in the presence of ladies, but
in male company, it was almost obligatory.
Doyle himself was a heavy smoker,
particularly when writing, and Holmes and
Watson followed suit. The atmosphere at
221b must have been heady. If Holmes was
not smoking his famous pipe, he would be
indulging in cigarettes, though not perhaps
to the extent he does in this story to prove a
point. In addition to pipe and cigarettes,
Holmes was also an inveterate cigar smoker,
writing famously a monograph Upon the
distinction between the Ashes of the various
Tobaccos.
In the 1890s sinister Russian ‘reformers,
revolutionists, nihilists’, like Professor Coram
and his wife Anna in this story, were
beginning to appear in London life. After
the assassination of the liberal Czar
Alexander II in 1881, and the subsequent
reactionary policies of the next Czar,
Alexander III, pockets of discontented
groups were on the increase in Russia, and
the Czar’s forces were rigorous in rooting
them out, driving many to set up
headquarters abroad. Lenin, for instance,
based himself in Zurich, whilst others fled to
London, which led to much resentment among the local population against these
‘aliens’ or ‘anarchists’. These political
refugees were blamed for an increase in
crime; this prejudice seemed justified when
in 1910, three policemen were murdered
in Houndsditch, by supposed Latvian
separatists. This sensation led to the Siege
of Sidney Street in 1911 at which the young
Stalin was alleged to have been present.
One commentator at the time said the
murderers were ‘socialists of the very worse
type, men who did not acknowledge
God or anything.’ Against this colourful
background of political refugees with whom
he would have had a great deal of
sympathy, Doyle sets his story.
The Adventure of the Missing Three-Quarter
Watson, who refers in The Adventure of the
Sussex Vampire to his experiences as a
rugby player, seems to have forgotten his
former prowess in this story. Any former
player would surely understand the game’s
terminology used in the telegram; yet he
describes it as ‘enigmatic’ and fails also to
recognise the name of its sender, Overton,
a well-known player. Likewise, he confesses
to having lost touch with the medical
profession, not recognising the name of Dr Leslie Armstrong, whom he subsequently
discovers to be a leading member of his
profession. Maybe this is why in The
Adventure of the Golden Pince-Nez, he is
reading a book on surgery in an attempt to
keep up to date. Since Holmes had bought
out Watson’s practice after his return in
1894, Watson had become so much a part
of the investigative team, that these lapses
are perhaps brought about by his having to
devote all his time to writing up the casenotes
of the busiest period in their joint
career, as well as keeping an eye on
Holmes’s cocaine habit!
Doyle himself was an inveterate
sportsman all his life—he tried his hand at
everything: football, golf, bowls, skiing,
billiards, boxing; but his favourite game was
cricket, and once he gained the distinction
of bowling out the great W.G. Grace.
Set in Cambridge, this story again raises
the question as to which university Holmes
attended. He seems to be unfamiliar with
the East Anglian countryside, and his
reference to Cambridge being ‘an
inhospitable town’ is often cited as proof
that he must therefore have studied at
Oxford—but we know from The Adventure
of the Gloria Scott that his student days
were not happy or sociable: ‘…always rather fond of moping in my rooms,’ he
reflected. The debate continues…
The Adventure of the Abbey Grange
Once again Doyle shows us a less attractive
side of Holmes in this story, as Watson is
subjected to a bout of literary criticism from
his colleague concerning the way he
presents his cases. One can hardly blame
Watson for responding with a bitter, ‘why
do you not write them yourself?’ Holmes’s
attack is undoubtedly a thinly-veiled cry of
irritation from Doyle himself at having to
turn out these potboilers instead of his (as
he felt) more important literary output.
Holmes vetoed any more stories from
Watson’s pen until after his retirement; a
day no doubt Doyle longed for! Under these
terms, The Adventure of the Second Stain
was not published until ten years after the
events it depicts, when Holmes was keeping
bees on the Sussex Downs!
At the crux of this story is the deeply
unhappy marriage between Sir Eustace
Brackenstall and his Australian wife, Mary
Fraser. Doyle wished to highlight the unfair
divorce laws then existing in England. In
1909, as President of the Divorce Law
Reform Union, he fought a campaign to give women greater equality in divorce
settlements, though, conversely, he by no
means supported women’s emancipation,
nor did he necessarily agree with divorce as
a solution to domestic problems. Whilst
writing this collection of stories, Doyle
became involved platonically with a young
woman, Jean Leckie, yet he never
contemplated divorcing his invalid wife,
Louisa, for his new love. It would have been
most uncharacteristic for him to give up on
any difficult situation he was in, however
much it meant sacrificing his own interests
and desires.
The Adventure of the Second Stain
Who was the real Lord Bellinger? Watson,
with his usual impeccable discretion when it
comes to matters of state secrecy, has surely
camouflaged his true identity. But he must
surely be the greatest Prime Minister of
the late Victorian period—William Ewart
Gladstone—‘Austere, high-nosed, eagleeyed
and dominant’. Paget’s drawing in the
original publication in The Strand magazine
certainly suggests Gladstone. In 1894, the
time of this scandal, he was in office for the
fourth time, and was indeed the Grand Old
Man of politics. He would have been 85.
This same year, Gladstone resigned because of ill-health—and if he was ‘Bellinger’,
maybe its cause was the stress produced by
this case!
On two other occasions in the Sherlock
Holmes stories precious objects are left lying
carelessly about. In the The Adventure of
the Naval Treaty, young Percy Phelps leaves
top secret documents open on his desk
while getting a cup of coffee; whilst
Mr Alexander Holder kept the precious
Beryl Coronet unguarded in his bedroom! Is
Doyle being openly critical of the endemic
incompetence of the government?
Doyle had had a rough ride in the world
of politics. He had stood in the post-Boer
War ‘Khaki’ election of 1900, in Edinburgh,
as a Liberal Unionist. He was eager to test
himself, as usual, to the full in this new
sphere, to go beyond his achievements in
literature, and to have lived ‘a full and
varied and perhaps useful life…and done
my duty as a citizen’. During his election
campaign he gave as many as ten speeches
a day, but vigour alone would not get him
elected. His refusal to indulge in dirty tricks,
like the other parties, left him exposed to
being constantly heckled and jokingly
referred to as ‘Sherlock Holmes’. Finally, a
smear campaign calling him ‘a Papist
conspirator’ began on polling day and no
doubt did him untold damage. Doyle lost the election by 500 votes. It left him
disgusted with whole party political
machine: ‘a mud bath,’ he called it, ‘—helpful, but messy’. This disillusion may well
have contributed to his picture of
inefficiency in high-office as depicted in this
story and The Adventure of the Naval Treaty.
Doyle reflects in this story the growing
anti-German feeling in Britain, long before
it found expression in World War I. The
‘foreign potentate’ alluded to by Lord
Bellinger is undoubtedly Kaiser Wilhelm II.
German products were beginning to flood
across the channel, threatening British
trade. Germany in the early 1900s
recognised the military possibilities of the
aeroplane, and was increasing its navy to
twice its size, in deliberate competition with
the British. The unstable temperament of
the Kaiser meant it was only a matter of
time before there was conflict. Doyle
reflects this uneasy state of affairs in this
prototype spy story, that was to become a
popular genre when conflict did materialise
in 1914.
Notes by David Timson
The music on this recording is taken from the NAXOS catalogue
DVOŘÁK Piano Trio No. 2 in G minor
8.554309
Joachim Trio
DVOŘÁK Four Romantic Pieces
8.554413
Edmund Battersby, piano
Zhou Qian, violin
DVOŘÁK Cypresses
8.553375
Vlach Quartet
Music programming Sarah Butcher