Arnold Schoenberg (1874-1951)
Concerto for String Quartet and Orchestra in
B flat, after the Concerto Grosso Op. 6, No. 7
by George Frideric Handel, freely transcribed and
developed by Arnold Schoenberg
Whereas the playing time of Handel’s concerto for
strings and continuo is fourteen minutes, and
Schoenberg’s orchestral elaboration of it 22 minutes, the
work should be counted among the latter’s compositions
and not simply as one of his orchestrations (Brahms,
Bach). He was not an unqualified admirer of Handel,
and indeed became livid if the name was mentioned in
the same breath as Bach. Apropos the Monn Cello
Concerto recomposed for Pablo Casals, Schoenberg
wrote:
| “I was mainly intent on removing the defects of
the Handelian style. Just as Mozart did with
Handel’s Messiah, I have had to get rid of whole
handfuls of rosalias and sequences, replacing them
with real substance. I also did my best to deal with
the other main defect of the Handelian style,
which is that the theme is always best when it first
appears and grows steadily more insignificant and
trivial in the course of the piece.” |
The concerto grosso form was introduced by
Arcangelo Corelli in Rome at the end of the seventeenth
century. In the early eighteenth century, after a fruitful
period in Venice, composing operas for the city’s
flourishing theaters, Handel moved to Rome, where he
soon came under Corelli’s influence in the new genre of
string ensemble music. In 1714 Handel followed
Corelli’s pupil Geminiani to London, where Corelli’s
set of twelve concerti, published posthumously, had
established a fashion. Handel’s own set of twelve
concerti probably dates from September 1739, which
seems a long time later, but the twenty-five-year interval
was filled in his case with the creation of a scarcely
believable quantity of other music, operas, oratorios,
cantatas, works for keyboard and other instruments.
Schoenberg’s Concerto for String Quartet and
Orchestra, after Handel, was composed in the summer
of 1933 in the Villa Stresa, Avenue Rapp, Arcachon
(Gironde), where he had written the Cello Concerto the
year before. Though officially described as a “leave of
absence,” on 23rd May 1933 he had been forced to leave
Berlin, and to flee with his wife and infant daughter to
the Hotel Regina, 192 rue de Rivoli, Paris, where he
soon reconverted from Lutheranism to the Jewish faith
of his early childhood. The Concerto was completed in
Arcachon before he left for America in October. The
work was first performed on 26th September 1934 in
Prague, conducted by K. B. Jirak and with the Kolisch
Quartet as soloists. Rudolf Kolisch, the first violinist,
was the composer’s brother-in-law.
These biographical circumstances seem to be at
odds with the character of the piece, arguably the
happiest, most high-spirited, playful, tender, tuneful,
and balletic music that he ever wrote. It is also one of
the most demanding for the solo instruments of a quartet
since Beethoven’s Great Fugue. The character of the
music could classify it as more a symphony than a
concerto, i.e., its slow introduction (Largo); fugal
Allegro first movement with extensive cadenza at the
end; slow (Largo) lyric 3/4 second movement; Scherzo
(4/8 time) Allegretto grazioso third movement (quasicadenza
at midpoint); and 3/2 time dance finale
(Hornpipe), but one listens to it thinking of the great
ballet Balanchine would have made of it.
The instrumentation is lapidary even for
Schoenberg, who manages by means of orchestral
doublings, constantly changing color combinations,
shifting of high and low ranges, and careful
manipulation of dynamics, never to “cover” the solo
quartet. The beginning of the first Allegro, for example,
an accelerating, mostly one-pitch fugue subject for six
woodwinds playing forte, is matched in volume by a
second entrance scored for pizzicato solo violin,
xylophone, piano, and harp, in other words percussive
timbres and articulation (plucked and hammered
instruments). The subject itself is suspenseful, a single
note shifted through different, increasing speeds.
After a forty-bar exposition, Schoenberg departs
radically from Handel in harmony and instrumental
style, employing consecutive triple stops and harmonics
in the solo strings. A little later still, the quartet seems to
go berserk, zooming through a wild “passage,” light
years from Handel, harmonically and instrumentally,
but ending with the fugue theme. The next event is a
cadenza for the soloists, each one playing consecutive
octaves in chromatic movement. Music lovers can only
delight in the developments, thematic recapitulations,
contrapuntal designs, and an adagio ending that presents
the fugue theme in a variety of speeds, simultaneously
and in different timbres and ranges.
The second movement features the solo quartet,
muted and with little help from the orchestra, except for
one lovely four-bar phrase where it is joined by three
different combinations of solo string trios from the
ripieni sections of the orchestra. The melody, the
counterpoint, are exquisite. So is the coda, which
ingeniously modulates to a new key.
Everyone will recognize, and want to sing along
with, the familiar melody of the third movement, at least
until its oddly dotted rhythmic development and
changing keys break free from Handel’s harmonic
spectrum. But the syncopated maestoso Hornpipe finale
is the glory of this too-little-known, difficult to play
masterpiece, which has never received such a fine
performance.
Suite for Piano, Opus 25
According to the manuscript, this neo-classic dance
suite—Präludium, Gavotte, Musette, Intermezzo,
Menuett with Trio and da capo, Gigue—was written
between 24th July, 1921 and 20th March, 1923.
Actually, the Intermezzo was composed on 21st July,
1921, about the time that Schoenberg told his pupil
Josef Rufer:
| “Today I have discovered something that will
assure the supremacy of German music for the
next hundred years” (i.e. the twelve-tone row). |
Allen Shawn’s comments on the Piano Suite in his
book Arnold Schoenberg’s Journey1 point out that “The
first two groups of four notes … end in a tritone, and the
first and last notes are a tritone apart. The last four notes
of the row spell the name Bach backwards. (H means B
in German, and B means B flat.) All the movements of
the Suite are based on the four forms of the row plus its
transposition to B flat. But what must more immediately
compel new listeners is the rhythmic invention in the
Präludium, and, indeed, in all the other movements.”
Shawn wisely invites us to examine musettes by
Couperin and Bach.
What immediately strikes the listener about this
music is its glitter and transparency, high-octane
brilliance, simplicity for the ear (and extreme difficulty
for the player). It contains more repetition than any
other Schoenberg piece, since the Gavotte is heard
twice, the first part of the Musette twice, the first part of
the Menuett three times, both halves of the trio twice,
and the first third of the Gigue twice. Ostinati are also
common, particularly in the Intermezzo. In bars 21–22
Schoenberg even manages to evoke Scott Joplin,
consciously or not. Remarkable, too, are the many
single lines (Gigue) and two-part counterpoint.
Lied der Waldtaube from Gurre-Lieder
(1923 Chamber Ensemble Version)
This most beautiful of Schoenberg’s Lieder is also his
most popular and in no need of commentary. The
listener should focus attention to the skill of the
transcription of the accompaniment from an orchestra of
over one hundred (in the original) for only the fifteen
instruments of his Chamber Symphony, joined by piano
and harmonium. Fittingly, the first performance took
place in Copenhagen.
The Book of the Hanging Gardens, Op. 15
15 Poems from Stefan George’s Das Buch der Hängenden Gärten
Schoenberg became interested in Stefan George’s
poetry in the autumn of 1907, and had set poems by him
before The Hanging Gardens (1908), most notably the
Litanei (Litany) and Entrückung (Rapture), the third and
fourth movements of the Second String Quartet, which
add a high soprano voice to the instruments. The
composer and poet seem to have had no personal
connection at all. One reason could be that as
charismatic leaders of cults, they too much resembled
each other.
In 1889, in Paris, George began to attend
Mallarmé’s “Tuesday evenings”, where he soon
attracted some of the most intelligent young literati in
the German-speaking world, among them Hugo von
Hofmannstal. George was homosexual by inclination, a
fact he tried to disguise by referring to lovers in genderneutral
terms (“you”, “my child”). The texts of The
Hanging Gardens are love poems, the only ones George
ever addressed to a woman (in this case the wife of
Richard Dehmel, author of the poem that inspired
Schoenberg’s Verklärte Nacht). But we are told nothing
about the relationship between her and the man, except
that they are destined to separate. We are also unable to
visualize the scene, which includes white marble
baroque fountains, storks and ponds, a desert, Northern
garden flowers and tropical palms. Furthermore, there is
no consistent narrative and there are no events.
The first performance of The Hanging Gardens
took place in Berlin, the Ehrbar Hall, 14th January,
1910, sung by Martha Winternitz-Dorda. Schoenberg’s
messianic program note for the occasion reads, in part:
With the George songs I have for the first time
succeeded in approaching an ideal of expression and
form which has been in my mind for years. Until now, I
lacked the strength and confidence to make it a reality.
But now that I have set out along this path once and for
all, I am conscious of having broken through every
restriction of a bygone aesthetic; and though to the goal
towards which I am striving appears to me a certain one,
I am, nonetheless, already feeling the resistance I shall
have to overcome: I feel that even the least of
temperaments will rise in revolt, and suspect that even
those who have so far believed in me will not want to
acknowledge the necessary nature of this development.
So it seemed a good thing to point out, by performing
the Gurrelieder—which years ago were friendless, but
today have friends enough—that I am being forced in
this direction not because my invention or technique is
inadequate, nor because I am uninformed about all the
other things the prevailing aesthetics demand, but that I
am obeying an inner compulsion, which is stronger than
my upbringing: that I am obeying the formative process
which, being natural to me, is stronger than my artistic
education.
Schoenberg’s pupil Egon Wellesz quotes the
composer saying that the initial words of the text, no
matter the meaning or the “poetic events”, meant
nothing to him while composing, and that he claimed to
have understood the poetic context only days after
finishing the music:
| “There to my great astonishment I discovered that
I was never more faithful to the poet than when,
led as it were, by the first direct contact with the
opening sounds, I felt instinctively all that must
necessarily follow from these initial sounds. Then
it became clear to me that it is with a work of art
as with every perfect organism.… It is so
homogenous in its constitution that it discloses in
every detail its truest and inmost being. Thus I
came to a full understanding … of Stefan
George’s poems from their sound alone … the
external agreement between music and text—
declamation, tempo, and tonal intensity—has
little to do with inner meaning.” |
R. C.