Joseph Martin Kraus
(1756-1792): Symphonies, Volume 2
Joseph Martin Kraus can be considered one of the most talented and
unusual composers of the eighteenth century. Born in the central German town of
Miltenburg am Main, he received his earliest formal education in nearby Buchen
and at the Jesuit Gymnasium and Music Seminar in Mannheim, where he studied
German literature and music. Following studies in law at the universities in
Mainz and Erfurt, Kraus spent a year at home in Buchen in 1775-1776, while his
father was under indictment for misuse of office, a charge later dropped. In
1776 he resumed his studies in law at Göttingen University, but under the
influence of the remnants of the Göttinger Hainbund, a literary
circle in the Sturm und Drang vein, be began to explore a career in
music. In 1778 he published his treatise Etwas van und über Musik, which
is one of the few actual theoretical works devoted to the adaptation of Sturm
und Drang literary philosophy to music.
In 1778, with the encouragement of fellow student Carl Stridsberg, the
composer decided to dedicate his life to music and to seek employment in Sweden
at the court of Gustav III. Although promised a position, he found it difficult
to break into the cultural establishment of Stockholm, and for the next two
years he faced dire economic circumstances as he attempted to overcome the
political obstacles in his way. His opera Azire was rejected by the
Royal Academy of Music, but in 1780 he was commissioned to compose a trial
work, Proserpin, the text of which had been conceived by the king
himself. Its successful private performance at Ulriksdal in 1781 brought an
appointment as deputy Kapellmästare and in 1782 a grand tour of Europe
at Gustav's expense to view the latest in musical and theatrical trends. This
took him throughout Germany, Vienna, Italy, England, and France, where he met
major figures of the period such as Gluck and Haydn.
Kraus returned to Stockholm in 1787 and the following year was appointed
as First Kapellmästare and director of curriculum at the Royal Academy
of Music. For several years he enjoyed a reputation in Stockholm for his
disciplined conducting, his activities as a composer and his rigorous
pedagogical standards. He was a participant in the Palmstedt literary circle and
contributed much to the establishment of Stockholm as one the leading cultural
centres of Europe. Soon after the assassination of Gustav III in 1792, Kraus
succumbed to tuberculosis and died at the age of 36.
As a composer, Kraus can be seen as one of the most innovative of the
entire century. His earliest training brought him the Italian style of the
Mannheim composers, the contrapuntal rigour of Franz Xaver Richter and J. S.
Bach, as well as the dramatic style of C.P.E. Bach, Gluck, and Grétry. A man of
many talents, the composer was also theorist, pedagogue and author (a book of
poetry and a tragedy). His compositional style features the unexpected and the
dramatic and it is no surprise, therefore, to find many forward-looking
stylistic devices that anticipate music of the next century.
Kraus began composing symphonies during his youth, and completed his
last only a few months before his death. In all some fourteen works in this
genre survive, although there are indications that this is only a fraction of
the total. Indeed six symphonies written in Göttingen and described in his
correspondence have been lost, as have groups of works from Buchen, Mannheim
and Paris. What has survived, though, indicates that a strong dramatic element
infuses the works, making them more theatrical than simply mass-produced
concert works. The trend towards more occasional, dramatic music intensified
during his last years, when symphonies were of lesser importance than the stage
in the musical venues of Stockholm.
The Symphony in A major (VB 128) is one of the earliest
symphonies by Kraus to have survived. Stylistic evidence dates the work to his
first years of formal musical study in Mannheim, from 1768 to 1772, when he
came under the influence of members of the famed Mannheim Kapelle. Evidence of
Kraus's interest in providing a dramatic foundation can already be found in
this youthful work. The first movement s characterized by bold unisons,
flashing motivic figures and expansively worked out contrasting themes, while
the second is filled with considerable lyricism. This symphony is one of only
two to include a minuet, filled with textural contrasts and a slightly obtuse
dance rhythm rather than the expected staid triple metre. The final movement,
however, is the dramatic tour de force, containing within a central
section a musical depiction of a hunt, complete with authentic horn-calls. The
viola part is largely missing in the original source of this work. For this
recording, the viola part has been added to the missing sections, doubling the
bass-line at the octave. This represents one possible version of the work,
although the original part may have been more independent, as evidenced by the
extant sections in the second and final movements.
The Sinfonia buffa in F major (VB 129) was likewise probably
composed during Kraus's early years in Mannheim. Unlike the previous work, it
is a three movement Italian sinfonia with a title that reflects the
dramatic content of the entire composition. The symphony is a miniature
pantomime, with an opening movement that moves swiftly between contrasting
scenes, from sudden outbursts of melodramatic emotion to melodies that trail
off into unsettling silence. The unusual drama is highlighted by the end where
a rising triad poses a musical question. The second movement with its
monophonic chant opening and sudden changes between major and minor reinforces
the dramatic content. The finale is a fast-paced 'perpetual motion machine',
with extensive virtuoso passages for the flutes, a forward-looking section for
strings that anticipates Verdi, and a portion of altered Gregorian chant, as if
a mendicant monk were wandering through the musical landscape of this
non-scenic drama.
The Symphony in F major (VB 130), composed for a small orchestra
of a pair of horns and strings, was written in 1776 during Kraus's enforced
residence in Buchen. In three movements, it reflects the composer's growing
maturity, whilst accommodating the reduced forces of the Buchen Kapelle. The
first movement is solidly composed, with particular attention paid to formal
structure. The use of Mannheim devices is evidence of his completed studies,
while the march-like secondary theme is calculated to appeal to audiences of
the time. The lyrical second movement contains a plethora of flowing melodies
whose technical structure provides for dynamic contrast and accentuation
without the need for special markings. The finale is a stylized hunt in 6/8
time, fast-paced and lively but without the particular allusions that
characterize the Symphony in A major.
The Symphony in C major a violino obligato (VB 138) dates from
Kraus's first years in Stockholm, 1778 and 1779. Similarly in three movements,
it is a work that foreshadows the composer's penchant for harmonic surprise
found in later works. The most salient feature is the existence of a solo
violin, whose virtuoso part is less than a concerto but greater than a normal obbligato
part. It is the eighteenth century equivalent of Berlioz's Harold in
Italy, in which the soloist interacts with the orchestra throughout,
sometimes as the soloist and at others as a primus inter pares. Indeed,
Kraus also includes smaller obbligato parts for the flute and
violoncello, lending the work an unusual soundscape. The opening slow
introduction begins in the odd key of E minor with layered suspensions leading
to a brief recitative passage for the solo violin and concluding with a G minor
tutti section. The main theme contrasts stark unisons with the full
orchestra, which is then taken up between the solo instruments and the ripieno
in almost concerto grosso fashion. The second movement is a flowing
lyrical piece that features ever-changing textures, while the finale contrasts
duple and triple rhythms in a madly rushing perpetual motion race to the end.
Bertil van Boer