REGISTER NOW AND GET
• 5 FREE tracks! • 101 tracks for $9.99
ClassicsOnline Home » SIBELIUS, J.: Symphonies Nos. 1 and 3 (New Zealand Symphony, Inkinen)
Following the success of their recordings of Sibelius’s Night Ride and Sunrise, Belshazzar’s Feast Suite and Kuolema (8.570763)—‘top-notch performances’ (Fanfare)—and Scènes historiques I & II and King Christian II Suite (8.570068)—‘polished and involving…handsomely true and atmospheric sound’ (Gramophone)—talented young Finnish-born Pietari Inkinen conducts the internationally acclaimed New Zealand Symphony Orchestra in poetic and sweeping performances of his compatriot’s Symphonies Nos. 1 and 3. This is the first volume in a new Naxos series.
The Right Stuff
Naxos founder Klaus Heymann's e-mail last week recommended some new releases including this recording of Sibelius's First and Third symphonies. I thought, "Yeah, sure Klaus, these are 'among the finest performances of these symphonies' you've ever heard - but I'd prefer to judge for myself." I own every Sibelius symphony cycle ever recorded (and many partial cycles as well), and I've spent many hours comparing the approaches of disparate conductors to these seven endlessly enthralling pieces of music. Only a few conductors possess the key to unlocking the mysteries they contain, none more than these two.
I am happy to admit how misplaced was my cynicism, for ever thinking that a record mogul would lead his potential buyers down the garden path. Like Mr. Heymann, I find that these are among the finest performances of these two symphonies that I'VE ever heard too!
This is particularly true of Inkinen's approach to the Third. This music sounds deceptively simple at a first hearing; later, after hearing performances that capture the music's subtleties, you realize that your first reaction was simple-minded. Sibelius was not taking an easy musical road in the Third, he was entering into a new musical language, which is exactly what Inkinen gives us. Simple-sounding melodies, true, but melodies that are underpinned by a harmonic backbone so solid that nothing sounds trite. And Inkinen keeps the rhythmic engine purring perfectly so that every subtle shift in tempo falls into its assigned place, and the even more subtle shifts in tonality make themselves felt organically.
The last movement's rhythmic driver is allowed to carry the music forward forcefully but not desperately, to a musical conclusion that is achieved more satisfyingly than I had ever imagined possible. Inkinen's approach was like driving a Porsche GT3 so perfectly that when the checkered flag waved it across the finish line, not one extraneous RPM had been wasted.more....
The First Disc in an Exciting new Sibelius series
I already have a couple of Sibelius symphony cycles but bought this disc when it was announced. I admit to being very familiar with the orchestra but had never heard of the conductor before. However my two favourite Sibelius symphonies on the one disc was too much temptation not to succumb. I was not disappointed.
The first Symphony is very often played in a way that you sense the symphonic greatness to come without actually feeling this is a great work. This was dispelled with this reading from the outset. Such an attention to detail by all concerned is a feature. From the evocative lonely clarinet solo at the opening, to the brilliant accelerandos, the diabolic waltz section and other changes of texture, dynamics and speed were beautifully realised. The orchestra responded to every gesture of this conductor and the intonation was spot on. Every following movement was the same and did not fail to impress me.
The third symphony, was as impressive, every change of mood and direction made a satisfying sense. It is not the easiest piece to bring off, particularly the second movement, but it is achieved with distinction in this recording. Particular praise should be given to the woodwind solos and parings and the great horn section. That is not to denigrate anyone else as the playing was first class.
This was a feature of the whole disc. I know both these works intimately and could not fault the direction or execution. If the rest of the series is as good, this will take a very prominent place in my collection.
If I had any negative comments to make about this presentation, I would be nit picking, however an observation (which may reflect my sound set up system more than the recording) was that I found the extreme bass a little woolly at times, but that was a very minor quibble.
This conductor and orchestra are certainly ones to keep an eye on.more....
By Ian Dando
New Zealand Listener
Jean Sibelius (1865–1957)
Symphony No. 1 in E minor, Op. 39 • Symphony No. 3 in C major, Op. 52
The Finnish composer Jean Sibelius, the son of a doctor, was born in 1865 in a small town in the south of Finland. The language and culture of his family, as with others of their class and background at the time, was Swedish. It was at school that he was to learn Finnish and acquire his first interest in the early legends of a country that had become an autonomous grand-duchy under the Tsar of Russia, after the defeat of Charles XII of Sweden. Throughout the later nineteenth century there were divisions between the Swedish-speaking upper classes and the Finnish-speaking people, the cause of the latter embraced by influential nationalists and accentuated by the repressive measures introduced by Tsar Nicholas II, before the revolution of 1905. In this society Sibelius was deeply influenced by his association with the family of General Järnefelt, whose daughter Aino became his wife. Nevertheless Swedish remained his mother tongue, in which he expressed himself more fluently than he could in Finnish.
The musical abilities of Sibelius were soon realised, although not developed early enough to suggest music as a profession until he had entered university in Helsinki as a law student. His first ambition had been to be a violinist. It later became apparent that any ability he had in this direction was outweighed by his gifts as a composer, developed first by study with Martin Wegelius, then with the pedantic Becker in Berlin and with Goldmark and, more effectively, Robert Fuchs in Vienna.
In Finland once more, Sibelius won almost immediate success in 1892 with a symphonic poem, Kullervo, based on an episode from the Finnish epic Kalevala. There followed compositions of particular national appeal that further enhanced his reputation in Helsinki, including the incidental music to the patriotic student pageant Karelia, En Saga and the Lemminkäinen Suite. During this period Sibelius supported himself and his wife by teaching, as well as by composition and the performance of his works, but it proved difficult for him to earn enough, given, as he was, to bouts of extravagance, continuing from his days as a student. In 1896 he was voted the position of professor at the University of Helsinki, but the committee’s decision was overturned in favour of Robert Kajanus, the experienced founder and conductor of the first professional orchestra in Helsinki. As consolation for his disappointment Sibelius was awarded a government stipend for ten years, and this was later changed into a pension for life. The sum involved was never sufficient to meet his gift for improvidence, inherited, perhaps, from his father, who at his death in 1868 had left his family in some difficulty.
Sibelius continued his active career as a composer until 1926, his fame increasing at home and abroad. The successful Symphony No. 1 of 1898 was followed by the still more successful Finlandia. Busoni had tried to arrange for the publication of his music by Belyayev, patron of the later nineteenth-century Russian nationalist composers, on the excuse that the Finns were, in a sense, Russians, or at least citizens of a Russian grand-duchy. This came to nothing, but subsequent publication by Breitkopf and Härtel ensured abroad a wider public than provincial Finland itself could ever offer. Symphony No. 2 in 1902 won an unprecedented success in Helsinki. This was followed by the Violin Concerto, Symphony No. 3 and, after an illness that put an end for the moment to his indulgence in alcohol and tobacco, Symphony No. 4, and by travel to the major musical centres of Europe, leading to international honour. Symphony No. 5 was written during the war, after which Sibelius wrote only four works of any substance, Symphony No. 6 in 1923 and, in the following year, Symphony No. 7, incidental music to Shakespeare’s The Tempest and, in 1926, the symphonic poem Tapiola. An eighth symphony was completed in 1929, but destroyed. The rest was silence. For the last 25 years of his life Sibelius wrote nothing, remaining isolated from and largely antipathetic to contemporary trends in music. His reputation in Britain and America remained high, although there were inevitable reactions to the excessive enthusiasm of his supporters. On the continent of Europe he failed to recapture the earlier position he had enjoyed before the war of 1914 in Germany, France and Vienna. He died in 1957 at the age of 91.
Sibelius completed his Symphony No. 1 in E minor, Op. 39, in 1898 and it received its first performance in April the following year under the direction of the composer in a concert that also included his new Atenarnes sång (Song of the Athenians), a work that used a text by Viktor Rydberg and was seen as an immediate response to the Russianising policies of the Governor-General Bobrikov, who was later assassinated by a Finnish patriot. The choral work and the symphony were welcomed with equal warmth, although critics at once sought a possible programme for the second of these, seeing it as a sequel to earlier orchestral works of overt national programmatic content.
The symphony is scored for pairs of flutes, oboes, clarinets and bassoons, four horns, three trumpets, three trombones, tuba, timpani, bass drum, cymbals and triangle, harp and strings. The first movement starts with a long-drawn clarinet melody, over the sound of the timpani. The tempo changes to Allegro energico and the strings enter, suggesting first the tonality of G major rather than E minor. The introduction contains the seed of what follows in the tripartite Allegro, with its two subjects, the gentler second related to the first. There is a central development and recapitulation, although the great sweep of the music may conceal the underlying structure. The poetic and strongly felt Andante is again closely interwoven in its material, with a central contrapuntal episode for bassoons for which Sibelius claimed a strongly Finnish character, and a return of its intensely romantic first theme. The Scherzo bursts upon the listener, its opening rhythm repeated with vehemence by the timpani. To this the central trio offers a tranquil contrast. Influenced, perhaps, by the Symphonie pathétique of Tchaikovsky that he had heard in Helsinki two years before, Sibelius uses the clarinet melody of the opening of the symphony to start the last movement, now entrusted to the violins that impart to it a greater degree of poignant yearning, a feeling that finally prevails, before the resignation of the last chords.
In 1905 Sibelius visited England for the first time, at the invitation of Granville Bantock, through whose agency, and that of Henry Wood and others, his music had begun to create a very favourable impression both in the provinces and in London. The composer was, in turn, favourably impressed by the English and the practical result of his brief stay was a commission from the Royal Philharmonic Society for a new symphony, his third, to be performed under his direction early in 1907. In the event the work was delayed and was performed for the first time in Helsinki in September in a programme that included the symphonic fantasia Pohjola’s Daughter, music of more obvious contemporary appeal. It was introduced to the St Petersburg public in November, when its first two movements, at least, pleased Rimsky-Korsakov, who commented on its difference from Russian music, although he added that the apparent originality might be simply superficial. Glazunov had taken exception to the closing material, the sinister hushed and relatively discordant scale in contrary motion, of the first-movement exposition, but the performance of the work in St Petersburg is an indication of the international attention that Sibelius was now receiving. The composer conducted the new symphony, dedicated to Granville Bantock, in London in 1908.
Symphony No. 3 in C major, Op. 52, is scored for pairs of flutes, oboes, clarinets and bassoons, four horns, two trumpets. three trombones, timpani and strings. It is classical in its proportions and in general lacks the overtly national characteristics of the earlier and later symphonies of Sibelius. The first movement opens with material that, as it is developed, is bound to suggest, if only fleetingly, Mahler in his favourite countryside. An unusual and harmonically remote minor key is chosen for the second subject and the exposition ends with a curious scale in discordant contrary motion, followed by a closely argued central development, before the return of the first theme in recapitulation, with its second subject in a key to correspond to its earlier appearance. The unusual key of G sharp minor is chosen for the slow movement, giving it an immediate feeling of remoteness, with its gentle woodwind melody accompanied by plucked strings, growing in intensity and leading to a deeply felt passage for strings, joined by the woodwind. Closely integrated material, analysed either as a form of rondo or even, if the relationship of the episodic material is thought close enough, as variations, leads to a final movement that starts as a scherzo. There are references to something of what has passed and a fragmented thematic texture, before the emergence of a hymn-like theme, which is used to lead to a conclusion of ultimate triumph.
Last Albums Viewed
SIBELIUS, J.: Symphonies Nos. 1 and 3 (New Zealand...